Marifat, Volume 32, Issue 5, No 308, Year 2024 , Pages 43-51
Examining the Concept of Online Cheating and its Effects on the Family Institution
نوع مقاله:
ترویجی
Writers:
Heydar Esmaeil Pour
/ Assistant Professor - Educational Sciences (Philosophy and Islamic Education) Payam Noor University / haydar592001@pnu.ac.ir
/ Assistant Professor - Educational Sciences (Philosophy and Islamic Education) Payam Noor University / haydar592001@pnu.ac.irAbstract:
Abstract
The age of Internet and cyberspace is progressing and expanding at an uncontrollable speed. All regions of the world are definitely dealing with the Internet, and life without internet will be full of problems. Internet has also created issues and problems for the valuable institution of the family. One of these issues is online cheating, which leads to secret relationships of one or both spouses outside of marriage with another person through the Internet and virtual space. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating online cheating and its effects on the family institution. According to the purpose of the research, descriptive method is used. The research results showed that online cheating causes a decrease in intimacy and leads to coldness in couples' relationships, as well as emotional divorce, distrust and cynicism between couples. Competent authorities should regard it necessary to take measures for treating and preventing this problem.
چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
Title :بررسی مفهوم خیانت اینترنتی و تأثیرات آن بر نهاد خانواده
Abstract:
عصر اینترنت و فضای مجازی با سرعتی غیرقابل کنترل در حال پیشرفت و گسترش است و قطعاً تمامی مناطق جهان با اینترنت سروکار دارند و زندگی بدون آن مشکلات زیادی را به همراه خواهد داشت. اینترنت همچنین مسائل و مشکلاتی را برای نهاد ارزشمند خانواده ایجاد کرده است. یکی از این مسائل خیانت اینترنتی است؛ که این مفهوم به روابط پنهانی یکی یا هر دوی زوجین خارج از بستر ازدواج با شخصی دیگر از طریق اینترنت و فضای مجازی می انجامد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی مفهوم خیانت اینترنتی و تأثیرات آن بر نهاد خانواده انجام شده است. با توجه به هدف پژوهش، روش تحقیق توصیفی است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که خیانت اینترنتی موجب کاهش صمیمیت و به سردی گراییدن روابط زوجین و همچنین طلاق عاطفی و کاهش اعتماد و بدبینی میان زوجین می شود؛ که لازم است اقداماتی جهت درمان و پیش گیری و مقابله با آسیب های این معضل توسط مراجع ذی صلاح انجام پذیرد.
- خدمتگزار، حسين و همكاران، 1387، بي‌وفايي همسران: روش‌هاي پيش‌گيري و رويارويي با بي‌وفايي، تهران، قطره.
- راغب اصفهاني، حسين‌بن محمد، 1412ق، المفردات في غريب القرآن، بيروت، دارالعلم.
- عظيمي، بي‌تا و همکاران، 1400، «پديدارشناسي رفتارهاي توجيه‌گر خيانت اينترنتي: سازوکارهاي رويارويي با تعارضات زناشويي»، مجله علوم پژشکي رازي، ش 2، ص 104ـ116.
- قرائتي، محسن، 1383، تفسير نور، چ يازدهم، تهران، مرکز فرهنگي درس‌هايي از قرآن.
- قرشي، علي‌اکبر، 1371، قاموس قرآن، چ ششم، تهران، دارالکتب الاسلاميه.
- کوپر، مانکوم، 1388، اينترنت: کمين اخلاقي، ترجمة حميد مرتضوي و بتول جباريان، تهران، دانژه.
- مجلسي، محمدباقر، 1965م، بحارالانوار، بيروت، مؤسسة الوفا.
- Alge, S. B. A., 2009, Lithuanians' attitudes toward internet infidelity and its correlates [Dissertation],. Denton, Texas, Texas Woman's University.
- Apostolou, M., 2019, "Why Greek-Cypriots cheat? The evolutionary origins of the big- five of infidelity", Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, N. 13(1), p. 71-83.
- Atkins, D. C; Jacobson, N. S & Baucom, H., 2001, "Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample", Journal of Family Psychology, N. 15, p. 735-749.
- Atwood, J. D & Schwartz, L., 2002, "Cybersex: The new affair treatment considerations", Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, N. 1(3), p. 37-56.
- Aviram, I & Amichai-Hamburger, Y., 2005, "Online infidelity: Aspects of dyadic satsifaction, self-disclosure, and narcissism", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, N. 10(3), article 1.
- Alenzuela, S., Halpern, D., James, E. and Katz, b., 2014, "Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce", Survey and state-level evidence from the United States Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, N. 36, p. 94-101.
- Bonebrake, K., 2002, "College students' Internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates", CyberPsychology and Behavior, N. 5 (6), p. 551-557.
- Clayton, R. B., 2014, "The third wheel: The impact of Twitter on relationship infidelity and divorce", Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, N. 17, p. 425–430.
- Cooper, A & Sportolari, L, 1997, "Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction", Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, N. 22, p. 7-14.
- Cooper, A., 1998, "Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium", CyberPsychology & Behavior, N. 1, p. 181-187.
- Cooper, A; Mansson, S; Daneback, K; Tikkanen, R & Ross, M. W., 2003, "Predicting the future of Internet sex: Online sexual activities in Sweden", Sexual and Relationship Therapy, N. 18, p. 277-291.
- Docan-Morgan, T & Docan, C. A., 2007, "Internet infidelity: Double standards and the differing views of women and men", Communication Quarterly, N. 55, p. 317-342.
- Gerson, M., 2011, "Cyberspace betrayal: Attachment in an era of virtual connection", Journal of Family Psychotherapy, N. 22, p. 148–156.
- Gordon, K. C, Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., 2008, "An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs", Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, N. 30(2), p. 213-231.
- Hertlein, K. M, & Piercy, F. P., 2006, "Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature", The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Families and Couples, N. 74, p. 366-371.
- Mileham, B. L. A., 2007, "Online infidelity in Internet chat rooms: an ethnographic exploration", Computers in Human Behavior, N. 23(3), p. 11-31.
- Özgün, S., 2010, The predictors of the traumatic effect of extramarital infidelity on married women: Coping strategies, resources, and forgiveness, PhD Dissertation, Orta Doğu Üniversitesi, Ankara.
- Peluso, P. R., 2007, "Infidelity: A Practitioner s Guide to Working with Couples" in Crisis, New York, Routledge Press.
- Schneider, J. P., Weiss, R., & Samenow, C., 2012, "Is it really cheat- ing? Understanding the emotional reactions and clinical treatment of spouses and partners affected by cybersex infidelity", Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Preven- tion, N. 19, p. 123–139.
- Shaw, J., 1997, "Treatment rationale for Internet infidelity", Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, N. 22(1), p. 29-34.
- Sheppard, V. J; Nelson, E. S & Andreoli-Mathie, V., 1995, "Dating relationships and infidelity: Attitudes and behaviors", Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, N. 21(3), p. 202-212.
- Underwood, H & Findlay, B., 2004, "Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships", Behaviour Change, N. 21, p. 127-140.
- Underwood, H., 2005, Who goes there? Demographics, personality and attachment style of those involved in Internet affairs, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Swinbum University, Australia.
- Weiser, D. A., Weigel, D. J., Lalasz, C. B., & Evans, W. P., 2017, "Family background and propensity to engage in infidelity", Journal of Family Issues, N. 38(15), p. 2083-2101.
- Whitty, M. T., 2003, "Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity", CyberPsychology & Behavior, N. 6, p. 569-579.
- Young, K. S; Griffin-Shelley, E; Cooper, A., OMara, J & Buchanan, J., 2000, "Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment", Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, N. 7, p. 59-74.
- Zola, M. F., 2007, "Beyond infidelity-related impasse: An integrated, systemic approach to couples therapy", Journal of Systemic Therapies, N. 26(2), p. 25-41.
Cite this article:
RIS
Mendeley
BibTeX
APA
MLA
HARVARD
VANCOUVER
shakiba, Mohammad reza, Esmaeil Pour, Heydar.(2024) Examining the Concept of Online Cheating and its Effects on the Family Institution. Marifat, 32(5), 43-51
Mohammad reza shakiba; Heydar Esmaeil Pour."Examining the Concept of Online Cheating and its Effects on the Family Institution". Marifat, 32, 5, 2024, 43-51
shakiba, M, Esmaeil Pour, H.(2024) 'Examining the Concept of Online Cheating and its Effects on the Family Institution', Marifat, 32(5), pp. 43-51
